Resources

EHRAC Bulletin

EHRAC Summer Bulletin

It’s been another busy and productive three months at EHRAC: we've litigated new cases, advocated for implementation of judgments, and trained our partners.

Read more

Latest

Submission

Disbarred, suspended or criminally prosecuted: Azerbaijani human rights lawyers

14.8.19: EHRAC compiled a list of Azerbaijani Human Rights lawyers who have been sanctioned, based on reports and information from partners.

Training resource

Witness Statements in International Human Rights Litigation: Preparation Guide

1.8.19: This booklet produced by EHRAC in English and translated into Russian and Georgian is a practical guide to preparing detailed witness statements.

Case Summary

Liblik & others v Estonia

28.5.19: Between August 2005 and October 2006, the Internal Security Service carried out secret surveillance of the applicants based on authorisation decisions of the prosecutor or preliminary investigation judge. The criminal proceedings brought by the Estonian authorities related to suspicions of corruption involving exchanges of plots of land in conservation areas for plots in areas where development was permitted. The first instance court acquitted the applicants, holding that the surveillance evidence was inadmissible as it had been obtained unlawfully.

Case Summary

Ter-Petrosyan v Armenia

25.4.19: The applicant, Levon Ter-Petrosyan, is an Armenian national who was the President of Armenia between 1991 and 1998. He was the main opposition candidate in the 19 February 2008 Presidential election, standing against then Prime Minister Mr Sargsyan. Immediately after the preliminary results of the election were announced, the applicant called on his supporters to gather at Yerevan’s Freedom Square to protest against alleged electoral irregularities.

Case Summary

Navalnyy v Russia (No. 2)

9.4.19: The applicant, Aleksey Navalnyy, is an anti-corruption campaigner and opposition political activist in Russia. In December 2012, he and his brother were accused of fraud and money laundering in relation to two companies. The applicant was later placed under house arrest.

EHRAC Bulletin

EHRAC Spring 2019 Bulletin

4.4.19: We have had a busy and exciting start to 2019 which we are delighted to be able to share with you in our new online Bulletin and Blog, launched today.

Case Summary

Drėlingas v Lithuania

12.3.19: The applicant, Stanislovas Drėlingas, is a Lithuanian national who served as a senior officer in the MGB and KGB Soviet security forces while Lithuania was part of the USSR. In 2014 (after Lithuania’s independence), the applicant was convicted of genocide for his role in the partisans’ arrest on the grounds that, as opponents to Soviet occupation of Lithuania, the partisans had been members of a distinct “national-ethnic-political group”.

Case Summary

Dzhioyeva & others; Kudukhova & Kudukhova; and Naniyeva & Bagayev v Georgia

29.1.19: The Court issued an admissibility decision in three cases against Georgia from Tskhinvali region concerning the Russia-Georgia conflict in August 2008.

Case Summary

Khadija Ismayilova v Azerbaijan

10.1.19: Award-winning Azerbaijani journalist Khadija Ismayilova received threats, and was secretly filmed and recorded, with the authorities failing to take action.

EHRAC Annual Report

Annual Report 2018

31.12.18: In 2018, EHRAC celebrated our 15th anniversary, which provided an important moment for reflection on all that we have achieved since our inception.

EHRAC Bulletin

EHRAC Bulletin Winter 2018

19.12.18: This is the 30th edition of the EHRAC Legal Bulletin, marking 15 years since its first publication. Throughout this time, we have aimed to provide timely, in-depth and engaging analysis of the latest legal developments in the former Soviet space, and from the European Court of Human Rights and Council of Europe. As a renewed commitment to this ambition, we are refreshing the Bulletin with a new online format.

Report

The severe toll of abusive drug laws in Georgia

19.12.18: In August 2018, Human Rights Watch (HRW) published a report on Georgia’s zero-tolerance approach to drug consumption or possession, which has resulted in harsh punishments, with prison sentences for drug-related offences often significantly exceeding those for serious crimes.