{"id":6819,"date":"2026-02-28T12:55:37","date_gmt":"2026-02-28T12:55:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/?post_type=case-studies&#038;p=6819"},"modified":"2026-04-11T12:58:03","modified_gmt":"2026-04-11T11:58:03","slug":"limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov","status":"publish","type":"case-studies","link":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/","title":{"rendered":"Limiting mass surveillance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Can states use the need for \u2018national security\u2019 to justify mass surveillance? Do we, as citizens, need to prove our own communications have been monitored to argue that legislation permitting surveillance is a violation of our rights?<\/p>\n<p>Order no. 70 of the Russian State Committee for Communications and Information Technologies, issued in 1999, required phone companies to install equipment that would allow the state direct access to their networks.<\/p>\n<p>In 2003, Roman Zakharov, the editor-in-chief of a Russian publishing company, and Chair of the Saint Petersburg branch of the media freedom NGO Glasnost Defence Foundation, brought legal proceedings against three mobile network operators, the relevant ministry and the Russian spy service, the FSB. His claim of a breach of his right to privacy was rejected by the Russian courts.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>The case<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>In 2005, working with Russian partner lawyers, we took Roman\u2019s case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).<\/p>\n<p>In December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR found that the Russian legislation had resulted in a violation of Roman\u2019s right to private and family life. The judgment highlighted that, even though he was unable to claim that he had been the subject of surveillance, the very existence of the legislation amounted to an interference with his rights. The ECtHR found that the Russian legislation on surveillance of mobile telephones failed to provide for \u2018adequate and effective guarantees against arbitrariness and the risk of abuse.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>The refusal by the Russian authorities to confirm whether Zakharov had been subject to surveillance limited his ability to challenge this in the domestic courts \u2013 the ECtHR judged this as a failure to provide an effective remedy.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>What this litigation achieved<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The Zakharov judgment had significant consequences for state surveillance across the member states of the Council of Europe.<\/p>\n<p>It was published a month after the UK Government\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/473770\/Draft_Investigatory_Powers_Bill.pdf\">Draft Investigatory Powers Bill<\/a>. As the privacy campaigner Matthew Rice noted at the time:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8216;The implications of this judgment go beyond Russia. Other European countries have introduced laws or are considering legislation that do not pass the tests of legality, necessity and proportionality set out by the European Court. In the UK, the review of the Investigatory Powers Bill would benefit from considering the Zakharov judgement&#8230; Part 6 of (the Bill) would struggle against the clear standard communicated by the Court for interception authorisations.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Matthew Rice in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/en\/zakharov-v-russia-refresher-on-how-far-europe-has-come\/\">Open Democracy<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Can states use the need for \u2018national security\u2019 to justify mass surveillance? Do we, as citizens, need to prove our own communications have been monitored to argue that legislation permitting&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":4,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"country":[26],"theme":[116],"category":[125],"class_list":["post-6819","case-studies","type-case-studies","status-publish","format-standard","country-russia","theme-civic-space-and-democratic-accountability","case-category-impact-case-study"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Limiting mass surveillance - European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Can states use \u2018national security\u2019 as a justification for mass surveillance? Do we need to prove our own communications have been monitored to argue a violation of privacy? In 2003, Roman Zakharov, the editor-in-chief of a Russian publishing company, and Chair of the Saint Petersburg branch of the media freedom NGO Glasnost Defence Foundation, brought legal proceedings against three mobile network operators, the relevant ministry and the Russian spy service, the FSB. When his complaint was rejected by the Russian courts, we worked with Russian partners to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Limiting mass surveillance - European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Can states use \u2018national security\u2019 as a justification for mass surveillance? Do we need to prove our own communications have been monitored to argue a violation of privacy? In 2003, Roman Zakharov, the editor-in-chief of a Russian publishing company, and Chair of the Saint Petersburg branch of the media freedom NGO Glasnost Defence Foundation, brought legal proceedings against three mobile network operators, the relevant ministry and the Russian spy service, the FSB. When his complaint was rejected by the Russian courts, we worked with Russian partners to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-11T11:58:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/key-ehrac-cases\\\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\\\/\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/key-ehrac-cases\\\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\\\/\",\"name\":\"Limiting mass surveillance - European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-28T12:55:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-11T11:58:03+00:00\",\"description\":\"Can states use \u2018national security\u2019 as a justification for mass surveillance? Do we need to prove our own communications have been monitored to argue a violation of privacy? In 2003, Roman Zakharov, the editor-in-chief of a Russian publishing company, and Chair of the Saint Petersburg branch of the media freedom NGO Glasnost Defence Foundation, brought legal proceedings against three mobile network operators, the relevant ministry and the Russian spy service, the FSB. When his complaint was rejected by the Russian courts, we worked with Russian partners to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/key-ehrac-cases\\\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/key-ehrac-cases\\\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/key-ehrac-cases\\\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Limiting mass surveillance\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/\",\"name\":\"European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ehrac.org.uk\\\/ru\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Limiting mass surveillance - European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)","description":"Can states use \u2018national security\u2019 as a justification for mass surveillance? Do we need to prove our own communications have been monitored to argue a violation of privacy? In 2003, Roman Zakharov, the editor-in-chief of a Russian publishing company, and Chair of the Saint Petersburg branch of the media freedom NGO Glasnost Defence Foundation, brought legal proceedings against three mobile network operators, the relevant ministry and the Russian spy service, the FSB. When his complaint was rejected by the Russian courts, we worked with Russian partners to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Limiting mass surveillance - European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)","og_description":"Can states use \u2018national security\u2019 as a justification for mass surveillance? Do we need to prove our own communications have been monitored to argue a violation of privacy? In 2003, Roman Zakharov, the editor-in-chief of a Russian publishing company, and Chair of the Saint Petersburg branch of the media freedom NGO Glasnost Defence Foundation, brought legal proceedings against three mobile network operators, the relevant ministry and the Russian spy service, the FSB. When his complaint was rejected by the Russian courts, we worked with Russian partners to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights.","og_url":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/","og_site_name":"European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)","article_modified_time":"2026-04-11T11:58:03+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/","url":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/","name":"Limiting mass surveillance - European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-02-28T12:55:37+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-11T11:58:03+00:00","description":"Can states use \u2018national security\u2019 as a justification for mass surveillance? Do we need to prove our own communications have been monitored to argue a violation of privacy? In 2003, Roman Zakharov, the editor-in-chief of a Russian publishing company, and Chair of the Saint Petersburg branch of the media freedom NGO Glasnost Defence Foundation, brought legal proceedings against three mobile network operators, the relevant ministry and the Russian spy service, the FSB. When his complaint was rejected by the Russian courts, we worked with Russian partners to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/key-ehrac-cases\/limiting-mass-surveillance-russia-zakharov\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Limiting mass surveillance"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/#website","url":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/","name":"European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"}]}},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-studies\/6819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-studies"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case-studies"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6819"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-studies\/6819\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6971,"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-studies\/6819\/revisions\/6971"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=6819"},{"taxonomy":"theme","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/theme?post=6819"},{"taxonomy":"case-category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/category?post=6819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}