{"id":1228,"date":"2011-01-27T07:39:06","date_gmt":"2011-01-27T07:39:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rcstaging.co.uk\/ehrac\/?post_type=case-studies&p=1228"},"modified":"2023-10-31T20:21:41","modified_gmt":"2023-10-31T20:21:41","slug":"freedom-of-movement-karpachevy-v-russia","status":"publish","type":"case-studies","link":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/key-ehrac-cases\/freedom-of-movement-karpachevy-v-russia\/","title":{"rendered":"Karpachevy v Russia"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\r\n
\r\n\t
\r\n\t\t
\n

Case No. 34861\/04
\n<\/a>Judgment date: 27 January 2011<\/strong><\/p>\n

The applicants were mother and son\u00a0and lived in Ozersk, a closed town in the\u00a0Chelyabinsk Region of Russia where the\u00a0Mayak nuclear fuel reprocessing plant is\u00a0located. In 2002 the son was sentenced\u00a0to four years\u2019 imprisonment following a\u00a0criminal conviction. Upon his release,\u00a0the Ozersk Town Administration and the\u00a0regional division of the Federal Security\u00a0Service (FSB) prevented him from returning\u00a0to the closed town or obtaining\u00a0permanent residence there on the basis of\u00a0his criminal conviction. the authorities\u2019\u00a0refusal to grant permanent residence had\u00a0been found unlawful by the domestic\u00a0judicial authorities but these judgments\u00a0were not enforced.<\/p>\n

For the full details of this case, please follow the link below.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Links<\/h3>\n