{"id":1114,"date":"2013-05-28T11:19:20","date_gmt":"2013-05-28T10:19:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rcstaging.co.uk\/ehrac\/?post_type=case-studies&p=1114"},"modified":"2023-10-31T20:48:41","modified_gmt":"2023-10-31T20:48:41","slug":"domestic-violence-eremia-v-the-republic-of-moldova","status":"publish","type":"case-studies","link":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/key-ehrac-cases\/domestic-violence-eremia-v-the-republic-of-moldova\/","title":{"rendered":"Eremia v the Republic of Moldova"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\r\n
\r\n\t
\r\n\t\t

Case No. 3564\/11
\n<\/a>Judgment date: 28 May 2013<\/strong><\/p>\n

The applicants were represented by Ms D.I. Str<\/span>\u0103<\/span>isteanu, a lawyer practising in Chi\u015fin\u0103u.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

X, a police officer, had abused his former\u00a0spouse (the first applicant) in the presence\u00a0of their teenage daughters (the second and
\nthird applicants) by beating and insulting her,\u00a0causing her and her daughters stress and psychological\u00a0suffering. Despite a judge imposing\u00a0a protection order against X, requiring him\u00a0to vacate the family home and banning him\u00a0from contacting the applicants, he continued\u00a0to physically abuse the first applicant and\u00a0verbally and psychologically abuse their\u00a0daughters. A criminal investigation into X\u2019s\u00a0acts was suspended by the local prosecutor on\u00a0the basis that X had committed a \u201cless serious\u00a0offence\u201d, did not abuse drugs or alcohol, had\u00a0three minors to support, was well respected\u00a0at work and in the community and \u201cdid not\u00a0represent a danger to society\u201d.<\/p>\n

To read about this case in full, please follow the link below.<\/p>\n

\n

Links<\/h3>\n