{"id":1112,"date":"2013-06-20T11:18:17","date_gmt":"2013-06-20T10:18:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rcstaging.co.uk\/ehrac\/?post_type=case-studies&p=1112"},"modified":"2023-10-31T20:48:31","modified_gmt":"2023-10-31T20:48:31","slug":"right-to-life-turluyeva-v-russia","status":"publish","type":"case-studies","link":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/key-ehrac-cases\/right-to-life-turluyeva-v-russia\/","title":{"rendered":"Turluyeva v Russia"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\r\n
\r\n\t
\r\n\t\t

Application No. 63638\/09
\nJudgment Date: 20 June 2013<\/strong><\/p>\n

In October 2009 the applicant\u2019s son disappeared\u00a0after being taken to the police station\u00a0in Grozny, where he was last seen with signs\u00a0of having been beaten, witnessed by his uncle.\u00a0The applicant lodged a complaint about it two\u00a0months after the disappearance of her son. The\u00a0Government did not argue that the applicant\u2019s\u00a0son was taken to the police station, however\u00a0it denied responsibility, since, as the Government\u00a0submitted, he had been released from\u00a0the police station. The applicant also submitted\u00a0that her brother-in-law was threatened by\u00a0the police after she lodged her complaint.<\/p>\n

To read this case summary in full, please follow the link below.<\/p>\n

\n

Links<\/h3>\n