{"id":1097,"date":"2013-12-19T10:58:29","date_gmt":"2013-12-19T10:58:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rcstaging.co.uk\/ehrac\/?post_type=case-studies&p=1097"},"modified":"2023-10-31T20:18:11","modified_gmt":"2023-10-31T20:18:11","slug":"right-to-life-dobriyeva-and-others-v-russia","status":"publish","type":"case-studies","link":"http:\/\/ehrac.org.uk\/en_gb\/key-ehrac-cases\/right-to-life-dobriyeva-and-others-v-russia\/","title":{"rendered":"Dobriyeva and Others v Russia"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\r\n
\r\n\t
\r\n\t\t

Case No. 18407\/10
\n<\/a>Judgment date: 19 December 2013<\/strong><\/p>\n

The four applicants were relatives of an assassinated\u00a0Ingush businessman. They included\u00a0his widow, Fatima Dzhaniyeva, who moved to\u00a0St. Petersburg for medical treatment following\u00a0subsequent unresolved car bomb attacks against\u00a0other members of the family. The morning after\u00a0their arrival on 25 December 2009, four relatives\u00a0of Dzhaniyeva disappeared during a car trip\u00a0across town. According to several eyewitnesses,\u00a0the men had been seized by armed, masked men\u00a0in civilian clothing. A criminal investigation into\u00a0their disappearance was formally opened on 25\u00a0January 2010 but failed to identify the culprits\u00a0and was suspended in 2011. The applicants\u00a0claimed that their relatives were detained by\u00a0officials of the Russian state and that they\u00a0were denied an effective investigation into their\u00a0disappearance, in violation of Articles 5 and 2\u00a0of the ECHR. They also claimed that the mental\u00a0suffering caused by the disappearance of their\u00a0relatives violated their rights under Article 3 and\u00a0that they were deprived of an effective remedy\u00a0in breach of Article 13.<\/p>\n

To read the case summary in full, please follow the link below.<\/p>\n

\n

Links<\/h3>\n